Commentary

Gaggle: Censorware for the 21st century   Recently updated !

This entry was posted in Commentary News and tagged education Gaggle journalism Kansas privacy on by

For many years, schools have used “censorware” to suppress dirty words, threats, and other undesirable communication on their data networks. The results have sometimes been comical and usually bad. In some versions it’s known as the “Scunthorpe problem,” referring to software that finds dirty words in substrings of harmless ones, such as “Matsushita” and “cockle.”

As technology advances, these tools don’t get better, only more intrusive. A lawsuit filed by students in Lawrence, Kansas has brought one of them to public attention. It’s called “Gaggle,” perhaps a portmanteau word for “gag Google.” An attorney representing the students says, “Students’ journalism drafts were intercepted before publication, mental health emails to trusted teachers disappeared, and original artwork was seized from school accounts without warning or explanation.”
(more…)

Steven Goddu’s falsehoods

This entry was posted in Commentary and tagged Goddu ICE liberty New Hampshire Rockingham on by

It’s unusual for me to write on this blog about a local politician, but I want this on the record so that people doing searches for information on Rockingham County Commissioner Steven Goddu will find this and know why they should never vote for him for anything.

Rockingham County, New Hampshire, has been negotiating with ICE to hold abductees and get money for it. County government in New Hampshire (which handles only a few functions) is headed by commissioners. Rockingham has three of them: Kathryn Coyle, Steven Goddu, and Thomas Tombarello. I was able to find contact information only for Goddu, so I wrote an email to him urging that the county not collaborate with ICE. His reply shows he is a dishonest person and should not be elected to any public office.
(more…)

Sympathy and empathy

This entry was posted in Commentary and tagged language usage vocabulary on by

This is a post about word usage, not about the murder of Charlie Kirk, but it started from seeing a lot of online rage about a statement of his. According to Snopes, he once said:

I can’t stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made-up, new age term that — it does a lot of damage. But, it is very effective when it comes to politics. Sympathy, I prefer more than empathy. That’s a separate topic for a different time.

It’s strange that of all the things he said, this should draw so much anger. If I were cynical, I’d say it’s because people saw an opportunity to pull the first sentence out of context and create a deceptive impression. In this case, cynicism is fully justified.

How much difference is there between sympathy and empathy, anyway?
(more…)

Reclaiming liberalism 2

This entry was posted in Commentary Personal and tagged liberalism liberty SanityProject on by

There’s no hope for a near-term turnaround in the US. If there were any decency left in America, Trump, Rubio, Homan, Leavitt, and the rest of the crowd would be climbing out of the Potomac, covered with tar and feathers. I’ve done what I can, pointing out one outrageous act after another. Nothing helps. The United States is a nation of cowards with a large minority that favors thuggish central rule and controls Congress.

Concentrating only on the short term leads to despair. Avoiding tyranny in the US — or recovering from it — requires understanding its causes and changing the intellectual climate. There can be a resurgence of the liberal ideal in America, but it will take time.
(more…)

Tech buzzword panic

This entry was posted in Commentary and tagged language SanityProject technology usage on by

EFF has run a valuable campaign on the risks of leaking metadata to third parties. If you upload a photo to a public website, for instance, the file might contain information on exactly when and where you took the picture. A stalker can make use of the information, especially if you upload photographs wherever you go. If you make a phone call or text message, the associated metadata may get less privacy protection than the what you said or typed. The US government has claimed that warrantless searches of communication metadata, which might identify the sender, receiver, and time of a message, are OK. Unfortunately, this has led some people to think that metadata themselves (I’m standing by “data” as a plural) are evil.
(more…)