The Sanity Project


Principles, not parties   Recently updated !

It’s easy to get depressed as the elections come closer. Some of us hoped the Democrats would recognize a golden opportunity to unite the country against a corrupt, dishonest, and brutal administration. Instead, they seem to think voters are desperate enough to vote against Republicans no matter how outrageous their opponents’ policies are. This will leave us with poor choices in November, with both sides offering illusory safety and security at the expense of liberty. Even if the Democrats get control of Congress, they won’t use it to put enduring limits on executive power.

Focusing on backing a party and its candidates is a mistake. An individual candidate may occasionally be worth backing, but even there caution is necessary. All candidates are good on some issues and bad on others, except for those who are bad on everything. Standing behind one can lead to ignoring or supporting the bad positions. It’s far better to support the right principles, regardless of who currently supports them.

Organizations that stand for causes are more likely to be consistent than people trying to get elected. A donation to FIRE or the Institute for Justice will accomplish more than one to a candidate. Organizations can drift too, but their shifts are usually more visible to the public than a candidate’s behind-the-scenes deals.

Finding facts and making them known becomes harder as things get worse. Journalism is in miserable shape, with news sources failing to distinguish reporting from opinion. Rumors and distortions spread on social media. Checking the reliability of a report isn’t easy, but it’s still possible to compare stories, separate facts from emotional language, see what sources they used, and consider what biases could have affected them.

As we fall into the Long Night, it’s easy to fall into “lesser evil” thinking. Let’s not forget that the lesser of two evils is still an evil. Finding ways to accomplish positive good is harder, but the worse things get, the more important it is.

“The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation on the ruins of public liberty.” — George Washington’s farewell address


Visiting America’s first public library   Recently updated !

I always enjoy visiting a library I haven’t seen before. The one I visited on August 13 says it’s the oldest public library in the USA, and it doesn’t seem to have any serious challengers. Its story has interesting parallels to the founding of Harvard College’s library. The town in one case and the college in the other got named after the person who gave their libraries a start.

In 1778, a newly incorporated town in Massachusetts called itself Exeter. Benjamin Franklin was popular among the residents, and the town renamed itself Franklin. They asked Franklin if he would donate a bell in acknowledgement. He decided a collection of books would be a better gift, and they became the core collection of a free lending library. Today’s library has those books (or as many as have survived) on display in a glass case. It’s quite a big library for a town of about 30,000 people.

There are reminders everywhere of the library’s origins. The Reading Room is elegant, with soft chairs and murals. A statue of Franklin holding a book is out front.

Franklin (MA) Library

Franklin Public Library

Reading room in Franklin Library

The Reading Room

Books donated by Benjamin Franklin, housed in Franklin (MA) Library

Books donated by Benjamin Franklin


Book discussion: Taking Funny Music Seriously   Recently updated !

An earlier version of this review is posted on my LibraryThing account.

I came across Taking Funny Music Seriously on Hoopla while doing research on P.D.Q. Bach. Half of a chapter is about P.D.Q., and it told me some things I hadn’t known, so it was worth it right there. It also has a lot to say about other people whose musical work I like: Dr. Demento, Weird Al, Tom Lehrer, Victor Borge, and more. I liked it enough that I’ve ordered a paperback copy.

Lily Hirsch writes, “I am a musicologist gone rogue.” She knows that humor is important. She rejects its dismissal as “just a joke”; that expression can trivialize an important insight, or it can excuse unnecessary nastiness. She complains, “We do not always take comedic music seriously because we aren’t supposed to consider and discuss it seriously. And we cannot consider and discuss it seriously because it’s funny music — unless, of course, the comedy crosses a certain line.” But she forges ahead regardless.

The book covers many areas, though it’s bound to the English-speaking world for the past hundred years or so. It deals with areas of music I’m familiar with, such as novelty music and classical music comedy, as well as ones I don’t have strong experience with. It’s fascinating to see how different musical cultures approach humor.

Filk music is briefly mentioned. The author defines it as “music based in fandom,” which is at least close, and mentions the filk group Omicron Ceti III. There are a couple of mentions of FUMP, the Funny Music Project; the book mentions one member of the filk community in this connection. Dr. Demento (Barry Hansen) is discussed at length, and he’s often helped to make filkers better known.

I have to note a typographical point which is rather important. It’s become faddish lately to capitalize some skin colors and not others. That isn’t right; it smacks of racism. Capitalize them all or none, I don’t care which.

If you like humorous music, I strongly recommend this book.


Music discussion on Leaflet

I’ve started a new publication on Leaflet, focused on music in all the ways it interests me. Leaflet is part of the Atmosphere network, about which I have mixed thoughts. It puts a bunch of different services under one account, sort of like Google. For now I’m treating this publication as an extension of my Bluesky account. How long I’ll continue with it depends on what happens with Leaflet and what kind of response I get.

The three areas of music I’m most interested in are filk, classical music, and silent film accompaniment. They might all turn up there. Please subscribe if it’s something you’d like me to follow. That will help me to know someone’s reading.


A P.D.Q. Bach discovery

I’ve put up a video on YouTube of a P.D.Q. Bach piece which perhaps no one had heard in years. It’s “Two and a Half Variations on In Dulce Jubilo. Peter Schickele’s website lists the piece and says it was performed on the December 23, 2000 episode of A Prairie Home Companion. I couldn’t find any recording of it on YouTube. Thankfully, all or most of the show’s episodes are available online. Less fortunately, the site only lets you play episodes from beginning to end, with no fast forward capability.

So I captured the whole episode on audio and then excerpted the piece and cleaned up the clip a little with Audacity. Then I combined it with a stock still picture and uploaded it to YouTube. If I’m lucky, no one will request a takedown. A lot of other P.D.Q. Bach pieces are on YouTube.

The circumstances of the composition and the instrumentation were unusual, even for Schickele. The show arranged a face-off for him and Bill McLaughlin to create the most unusual arrangement of a Christmas song. Each one assigned four instruments to the other. Knowing there’s no instrument unusual enough to faze Schickele, McLaughlin had him write a piece for koto, musical saw, krummhorn, and serpent. He then asked whether the piece should be credited to Schickele or P.D.Q. Bach, and Schickele claimed it was his newest P.D.Q. Bach “discovery.”

Unlike most pieces by the fictional composer, it doesn’t have a Schickele number. I’ve assigned it WoS (Werke ohne Schickelezahl) 11.