Internet


Standard Reader and the Decentralized Web   Recently updated !

Thanks to Debbie Ohi, I’ve found a reader for sites that use Standard Site lexicons. Appropriately enough, it’s called Standard Reader. It’s still rough, but I like what it’s aiming for. You can search for publications from various sites and subscribe to them. Once you have some subscriptions, your recommendations are based on them and nothing else.

Supposedly you can log in with an existing Bluesky account. I couldn’t figure out how to do that. The first time I tried to register, I got a Captcha with incomprehensible instructions. The second time I got one that made sense. Here’s what I’ve subscribed to so far.

  • Debbie’s Blatherings – by Debbie Ridpath Ohi
  • Aaron Ross Powell
  • Standard.site
  • Atmosphere Community
  • Connected Places

Supposedly I can change my handle to my own domain, and there ought to be a way to add my site to the index; I haven’t figured that out either. Some of the tools I’ve seen are tied to Bluesky, which they shouldn’t have to be.

I’m still working on publishing this blog to the ATmosphere, as the network of AT protocol services is called. A lot of this stuff is still at the experimental level. Some of the approaches being taken won’t scale up; you can have a list of a thousand sites, but not a million. Better discovery tools will be necessary, and their maintainers will have to defend them against spammers.


Returning to the decentralized Web   Recently updated !

The original idea of the World Wide Web was decentralization of information. Anyone with an Internet connection can set up a website. Others can link to it so that people will discover it. Somehow, though, it’s lost its way. Big “social media” sites dominate it. They let you find a lot of people you know or are interested in in one place. But this advantage comes at a price. On most of these sites, the software controls which posts you see and who is recommended to you. They’re more vulnerable to government censorship than smaller, more agile sites. People complain about them but keep using them.

It’s getting worse. Some countries are banning social media access by young people. There’s talk of legally requiring people who post to these sites to disclose their identity. This will discourage the expression of dissent and intimidate people who want to discuss problems they aren’t even comfortable telling their own families about.

The solution has always been there. It’s decentralization. Blogs and forums hosted on the creators’ own machines or for a monthly fee on a server. The RSS and Atom protocols let you subscribe to most of them without handing them any information. The main problem is finding the ones you’re interested in. Some work is now being done on a set of lexicons built on the AT protocol called standard.site, which will help with discovery and identity.

A lexicon is a schema for metadata; standard.site lets you publish information about your website in a way that lets it be aggregated. If you create a record for your website, it includes at least the name and URL, and it can include things like an icon, a description, and labels. What you do with a standard.site record once you’ve made it isn’t clear to me; I assume you need to submit it to an aggregator that lets people search for sites that interest them. There could be lots of aggregators, catering to different interests. If the idea catches on, search engines might use them to improve the relevance of their results.

There are some client applications for standard.site, but I’m still looking for one that I’m comfortable with. Ironically for a discovery aid, the name makes finding information difficult; a search on “standard.site” turns up mostly irrelevant results.

If you know more or have other ideas for decentralization, let me know.


Strange domain stuff 4

Recently I got two emails concerning the use of the name “McGath” in Chinese domains. It’s very strange. Here’s the first, which I got on April 25, 2026:

(If you are not the CEO, please forward this message to your CEO since this is urgent. If you consider this has been sent to you in error, please ignore it. Thanks.)
Dear CEO,
This is a formal email. We are the Domain Registration Service company in Shanghai, China. I have an issue to confirm with you. An application was received by us from Yahui Ltd on April 25, 2026. They desire to register “mcgath” as their internet keyword and Chinese domain names (mcgath.cn, mcgath.com.cn, mcgath.net.cn, mcgath.org.cn). But after checking it, we find this name conflicts with your business name or brand name. To resolve this issue better, it’s necessary to send this email to you and verify if this company is your distributor in China? Best regardsFrank Liu
General Manager

The message came from 163.com, which is a Chinese email service often used for temporary addresses. It’s suspicious that the message doesn’t name the domain service which allegedly is contacting me. If this was an attempt to trick me into anything, I can’t tell what it could gain from me. I replied saying I have no business presence in China. On April 27 I got this mail:

To whom it concerns,

We are the company who submitted the application to register “mcgath” as Chinese domain name and internet keyword. We intend to register the Chinese domain names “mcgath.cn” “mcgath.com.cn” “mcgath.net.cn” “mcgath.org.cn” and internet keyword “mcgath” and have submitted our application. Currently, we are waiting for Mr. Frank Liu’s approval. These CN domains and internet keyword are very important for us to promote our business in China. Even though Mr. Frank Liu advised us to choose another name, we will persist with this name.

Kind regards

Lisheng

Even though my surname is unusual, I don’t own it and can’t stop anyone else from using it. However, I can’t think of any honest purpose for this. While I know little about the Chinese language, I’m pretty sure you can’t even pronounce the name properly in the Chinese phoneme set. Maybe they’re planning to squat on the name in the hope someone (like me) will buy the domain? I can’t grab up every possible domain that contains “mcgath.” A worse possibility is that they’re planning some impersonation scheme outside the reach of American lawyers. I can’t do anything about it before it happens, and it seems like a strange way to set up a scam.

All I can say right now is that I have no control over or connection with those domains, and I’m not responsible for whatever they do with them.


A note on comment notifications

When a comment gets posted to my blog, the server sends me an email to let me know. In most cases it lands in my spam folder, and with good reason. WordPress is doing something dumb.

The email is using the “From” address which the commenter provided. With modern SPF, DMARC, and DKIM protocols, which are almost mandatory today, the owner of an email account indicates which servers are authorized to use its address. The receiving IMAP or POP server will check if it came from an authorized IP address. If it didn’t, the server may mark it as spam or block it completely. Failure to do authentication properly is one of the biggest reasons legitimate mail gets flagged.

People posting comments on my blog aren’t going to authorize my WordPress server to send email for them. When my personal email server gets a message with a “From” address that belongs to the commenter but a received-mail path that comes from the website server, it looks exactly like impersonation. Technically, it is.

I don’t know why WordPress does it this way. It could use a “From” address on garymcgath.com for comment notifications, and the mail would almost certainly get through.

This means I usually don’t see comment notifications, so it may take longer for me to reply. Sorry.


Reclaiming liberalism, revisited

The words “liberal” and “liberty” look similar, and they come from a common root. At one time, the word referred to the advocacy of liberty. In the middle of the twentieth century, particularly in the USA, it took on a different meaning, advocacy of government as the solution to everything. The pendulum is swinging, back, though. As I noted in my earlier post on “reclaiming liberalism,” advocates of liberty and justice under law are being attacked as “liberals.” Meanwhile, the government-solves-everything bunch now prefers to call itself “progressive.” They’re vague on what they’re progressing toward.

I’m bringing this up again because the Institute for Humane Studies has launched an exciting new website, Liberalism.org. Many of the names on it will be familiar to advocates of liberty: Jason Kuznicki, Aaron Ross Powell, Radley Balko, Ilya Somin, Sarah Skwire, and others. And they pay for articles! I need to look into that. Their choosing to label the site liberal rather than libertarian is significant. While there are still overtly libertarian individuals and organizations fighting a good fight, the Libertarian Party has damaged the name by accommodating populists. It’s time to say that we, not the Democratic Party, are the real liberals.