publishing


The hidden secret of digital music

Last weekend I came across a YouTube video on a resurgence in CD sales. It made me realize how many people are unaware of any part of the music business outside streaming. The commentator talks about CDs as having the appeal of “no subscription, no registration, buy it one time, play it forever.” There’s a mention of Spotify, but no hint that it’s possible to buy and download music that you can move from device to device and keep playing without depending on DRM.

In fact, a lot of companies sell DRM-free music downloads. Back in the early days of the Web, users who wanted unrestricted music files battled companies who didn’t want copying. The companies had to concede that they’d sell more music without copy protection than with it. Today you can buy music in the antiquated but widely supported MP3 format, or in higher-quality formats such as FLAC, Ogg Vorbis, and AAC. I buy a lot of music on Bandcamp and Presto Music, and I download them so that I’ll still have the files even if the companies drop the albums or go bankrupt.

Buying music helps to support artists. Streaming sites tend to pay very little per play, and Spotify is one of the stingiest. I like Bandcamp because most of what I pay goes toward individuals and performing groups who created the albums. Presto also offers streaming, and I use it to try out music; it pays a much better rate than most of the big streaming services.

I also have a ridiculous number of CDs. It wouldn’t surprise me if I have the largest collection of C. P. E. Bach on CD of any individual owner in New Hampshire. I’ve digitized some of them so I can play them in my car. My collection of purchased audio files will never catch up with it, but it’s growing steadily.

Why buy rather than stream? To support the musicians. To have the assurance that the music will always be available. To be able to play it even when you don’t have a good Internet connection. To have the satisfaction of owning rather than renting.


Reclaiming liberalism, revisited

The words “liberal” and “liberty” look similar, and they come from a common root. At one time, the word referred to the advocacy of liberty. In the middle of the twentieth century, particularly in the USA, it took on a different meaning, advocacy of government as the solution to everything. The pendulum is swinging, back, though. As I noted in my earlier post on “reclaiming liberalism,” advocates of liberty and justice under law are being attacked as “liberals.” Meanwhile, the government-solves-everything bunch now prefers to call itself “progressive.” They’re vague on what they’re progressing toward.

I’m bringing this up again because the Institute for Humane Studies has launched an exciting new website, Liberalism.org. Many of the names on it will be familiar to advocates of liberty: Jason Kuznicki, Aaron Ross Powell, Radley Balko, Ilya Somin, Sarah Skwire, and others. And they pay for articles! I need to look into that. Their choosing to label the site liberal rather than libertarian is significant. While there are still overtly libertarian individuals and organizations fighting a good fight, the Libertarian Party has damaged the name by accommodating populists. It’s time to say that we, not the Democratic Party, are the real liberals.


Amazon backstabs e-book “buyers”

If you pay for an e-book that has DRM (digital rights management) on it, you aren’t really buying it, no matter what the vendor says. At best, it’s a long-term lease which can be revoked at any time. Amazon has made this plain by removing the ability to download permanent copies of any and all e-books you may have “bought.” As of February 25, 2025, you will no longer be able to download your “purchases” to a device that isn’t directly under Amazon’s control.

If you care about keeping what you “own,” you need to download all your “purchases” before then. You have to do it one book at a time, which can get tedious if you’ve “bought” a lot of books.
(more…)


A look back at the Valancourt case

This post presents the finish of a story that I first blogged about in 2018. Court cases can take a long time to reach a resolution, and I missed it when the decision came out last year. Before the resolution of Valancourt Books’ lawsuit, the US copyright office demanded a free copy of every book published in the US. It was uneven in pressing its demands; for reasons I don’t know, it came down hard on Valancourt, a small-run publisher. The requirement was especially burdensome for such publishers; it costs a bigger part of your assets to send out an unpaid copy when you print a hundred copies or do print-on-demand than when you print a hundred thousand. Regardless of the number, it was a clear-cut violation of the Fifth Amendment, which says the government can’t take private property for public use without paying “just compensation.”

In 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia agreed with this reasoning and said the requirement for free copies was unconstitutional.
(more…)


Update on Smashwords and Draft2Digital

Smashwords is now saying that some accounts will be automatically moved to Draft2Digital. A May 1 email says:

On June 1st, we’ll begin automatically migrating some Smashwords author accounts to Draft2Digital. If you desire more control over the migration process, or want to have your account migrated sooner, please complete the brief questionnaire that was previously sent to the email address associated with your Smashwords account.
 
When Draft2Digital acquired Smashwords in March 2022, we announced that the integration of the two companies would be completed in three phases, with the final phase involving the migration of Smashwords author/publisher accounts over to Draft2Digital. Given the vast number of Smashwords accounts, the migration process itself must be divided into phases to ensure maximum effectiveness and efficiency.

(more…)