Monthly Archives: September 2026


Thoughts on blogging 3

It’s a full week since my last post. I’ve been busy, adding volunteer work with the Museum of Printing to my schedule and getting back to regular singing with the Exeter UU choir after a summer break. During that time, I’ve been thinking about what blogging (especially this blog) accomplishes and how I might reach more people.

Blogs were once a bigger part of the Internet. It’s easy to set one up, and as long as you don’t do things that will upset the hosting provider, you can say what you want. People can follow it in a variety of ways, and they don’t need to hope the software will declare it worth seeing. That’s not what people want now. They want to have everything in one place, they subscribe to much more than they can read, and they trust the website to decide which items they’ll see. Then they’ll gripe about The Algorithm, but these sites are just giving them what they want. They don’t want the responsibility of being active readers, but they don’t want a big corporation’s software making their decisions for them. What do they want?

A lot of them don’t want in-depth reading. They want a flow of input which they’ll passively absorb. People are reading less long-form material than they used to. Even a 1000-word blog post is too much for many. Still, the written word is vitally important. That’s the best place to record facts and explore ideas. Building and keeping an audience is hard, and sometimes it’s frustrating to see which posts work and which don’t. For a while, my most popular post was a piece of fluff on why the New York Times excluded some words from Wordle and not others. I eventually deleted the content.

I keep a blogroll in the sidebar to link to blogs readers might find interesting, especially if they’re by people I know. That used to be an important way to find blogs, as well as building the search rank for ones a lot of people liked. Google tweaked its search algorithm to give little weight to blogrolls, so many people gave up, but they still help people to find material they’ll like.

RSS feeds are a good way to track blogs, especially ones with irregular schedules, and many blogs have one by default, but not as many publicize their feeds. Maybe I’m just an old Neandertal longing for the old, decentralized Internet, but it had something which the big social media sites don’t have as much of: control over what you read.

I’ll keep writing and obsessing over my readership statistics. Some people will keep reading, and hopefully they’ll find something of value.


SUBSCRIBE

Enter your email address to subscribe and get notifications of new posts by email.


25 years ago: September 11, 2001

25 years ago, I drove to work in Woburn, Mass. When I got to the building, a crowd was gathered around a TV. All I could immediately gather was that Bush was saying something of great concern, and people were too distracted to explain it to me. After going up to the office I learned what had happened.

I had a window that looked east, and normally I regularly saw planes taking off from Logan Airport. The absence of flights for the next few days made the most direct impact on me. MASSFILC published a songbook, which I edited, in memory of the thousands of deaths.

Another kind of harm took longer to emerge, and it’s played out to the present. Congress passed the “temporary” Patriot Act, which is still in effect today. The TSA made life miserable for air passengers without being effective at catching threats. Congress created the Department of Homeland Security and ICE. A bus was stopped in mid-trip in New Hampshire, and passengers were given the choice of allowing a warrantless search of their luggage or being abandoned far from any bus station. The US government used lies to justify an invasion of Iraq. Warrantless domestic surveillance greatly increased. None of this did much to make us safer.

American society’s distrust of foreigners, especially Muslim foreigners, increased. Every president since 2001, including one who got a Nobel Peace Prize, has launched military actions in the Mideast. Trump has hit new levels of audacity, but Congress has long been in the habit of shrugging off presidential usurpations of the war-making power. “National security” has become the all-purpose excuse for power grabs.

The World Trade Center was only the most visible part of the damage which Bin Laden did. The effects on our society have been far more persistent.


SUBSCRIBE

Enter your email address to subscribe and get notifications of new posts by email.


ICE watching in New Hampshire

For the second Tuesday in a row, I hung around a polling location with a clip-on camera, in case the Feds tried anything. Except for an ambulance taking someone away, presumably because of a medical issue and not violence, nothing out of the ordinary happened. I got noticed, though.

The amusing thing was a guy standing outside with a Scott Brown sign. Brown was one of the two leading candidates for the Republican Senate nomination; he lost to John Sununu. Sununu has Trump’s endorsement, but Brown is as bad. Sununu supports the SAVE Bill and wants the government to ignore the Constitution’s birthright citizenship clause. I barely looked at the sign holder, but every time I walked by, he tried to talk with me. I don’t know what he was thinking; his comments were just weak attempts at conversation starting. He must have noticed the camera, though, and I’m hoping that he was nervous because of that. At one point he suggested I pick up a Goodlander sign that was lying on the ground, though I’d shown no sign of partisan preference; Goodlander has won respect for standing up to Trump’s call for her execution.

That’s not much. One guy with a camera maybe making one Trumpist worry that if ICE goons showed up, they could be caught on camera. But if lots of people are watching the polls in November, it could make ICE less inclined to intimidate people. And if it still does, there will be more video records of its action.

It’s not much, but it’s something.


SUBSCRIBE

Enter your email address to subscribe and get notifications of new posts by email.


Publicizing those worth publicizing

Many people on social media put their efforts into pointing out ridiculous or nasty statements. Sometimes denunciation is necessary, but it shouldn’t be anyone’s main focus. It gives publicity to bad ideas. When a lot of people do it, it makes them part of the dominant dialogue. It draws attention away from people with more reasonable and better argued positions. Some people will find the nonsense interesting and even convincing.

Focusing on people with good things to say and solid arguments behind them draws attention to them, and usually that’s helpful. People can learn something from them, which is more than they can do from the words of fools.

I’m not saying that “Any publicity is good publicity” is literally true. There have been plenty of cases where people have said unpopular things and suffered a loss of business and reputation. But repeatedly hearing an idea can make it seem more acceptable. Anyone who already felt sympathy for it might feel less marginalized.

People need to rally around good ideas more than they need to denounce bad ones. If they only hear that bad ideas are bad, they’ll become discouraged or cynical. Without good ones, you don’t even have a standard that lets you reject the bad ones. Tyranny is bad because freedom is good. Socialism is bad because individual autonomy is good. Murder is bad because human life is good. Bad ideas can be worth dissecting, but you need a framework to do it.

As George Washington may or may not have said, let’s raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair.

Note: I accidentally published a fragmentary draft on freedom of expression in Bow, NH. I immediately deleted it, so probably only the people who get email notifications saw it. Sorry.


SUBSCRIBE

Enter your email address to subscribe and get notifications of new posts by email.