Gary McGath


About Gary McGath

I am a freelance technical writer in Plaistow, NH.

How to write about chess

Certain errors constantly appear in TV shows and movies portraying chess games. I’m no expert player, but I know the rules well and used to go to tournaments. Here’s a guide on mistakes to avoid.

The starting position

First, the board must be positioned correctly. The lower right square from each player’s viewpoint must be white. It’s amazingly common for illustrations and TV and movie games to get this wrong. See, for example, this well-known scene from The Seventh Seal.

Queen faces queen, king faces king. The white queen is on a white square, and the black queen is on a black square. Going outward from the queen and king are the bishops, knights, and rooks. The colors of the opposing sides don’t have to be black and white, though they’re called that by convention.

Starting position of a standard chess game

The play

Chess etiquette says that you leave your opponent undisturbed while they’re considering their move. You don’t rush them, even if they’ve been contemplating a full minute. A good player will always take time to consider the possibilities. Casual conversation during a game is unusual. Silence can make the scene dull, so the actors can speed up the play and perhaps have a conversation related to the plot. Avoid showing pressure on the opponent, unless it’s to show how rude a player is.

The moves in a visual presentation should be plausible. I don’t know who controls this, but probably the script writer isn’t expected to dictate each move. Maybe the actors pick their moves, or maybe the director does. Probably the game won’t be shown move for move, anyway.

The chess game in The Thomas Crown Affair is nicely done. The moves are plausible, and the players are quiet. The woman is trying to distract the man with her looks, but that’s presumably part of the story.

Terminology

A gambit is the offered sacrifice of a pawn in the game’s opening.

The pieces that look like crenellated towers are rooks, not castles.

A stalemate is a position where a player isn’t in check but has no legal move. The game is a draw. Draws by agreement or by other rules aren’t stalemates.

Checkmate out of nowhere

What really bugs me is the scene where a player effects a checkmate without the opponent seeing it coming. This happens only among beginners, but we see it all the time. In a normal game, one player will realize defeat is inevitable at least a few moves before the end. Yes, a checkmate out of nowhere is dramatic, but there are other ways to achieve drama. The player on the losing side can sense the noose tightening. The one with the advantage can announce, “Mate in four.” Then maybe the opponent will say. “I don’t think so … Damn it, you’re right. I resign.” Good actors can make more out of that than out of a sudden checkmate. Most games among competent players end with a draw or a resignation, rather than being played out to the checkmate.

A player can resign by saying “Resign,” or by tipping over the king.

Here’s an article with a long list of TV shows, movies, and comics with chess blunders.

These tips may not apply to chess variants. Speed chess is fun; it imposes a tight time limit on the players’ moves, so it could allow a livelier scene. No one knows the rules for Star Trek’s 3-D chess, so anything goes. But if you’re portraying a game of standard chess, these tips may help you to avoid mistakes without sacrificing drama.


“The Hunchback of Notre Dame” at Boskone

At Boskone 63 in Boston, I stepped in twice as a movie accompanist. The first was a ten-minute film (and I mean film, the 16 millimeter kind) of scenes from the Seattle Worldcon. Then I noticed that on Sunday morning, the 1923 Hunchback of Notre Dame was scheduled, apparently with just whatever music came with the video. I made last-minute arrangements to accompany it. Zero practice, and I hadn’t brought my best keyboard, but I know the movie well.

We’re talking about my accompanying a properly scheduled silent feature film next year.


Don’t let a bot do your writing

A couple of days ago I was in a conversation where one of the people talked about letting an AI bot rewrite her business correspondence. She thought that her own style might seem abrupt and an appropriately directed chatbot could produce a less confrontational tone. Handing authorship to a bot is almost always a bad idea.

If it’s something purely utilitarian, like placing an order, then fine. Having software write up the request could save some time and make sure the numbers add up. But if it’s something the reader will care about, then it should come from you, not a machine. There’s still room for software to help you. A spelling and grammar checker can catch errors. I’ve used Grammarly and Language Tool. The important thing is to look at each suggestion and decide whether you want it. You can even have it check your tone, as long as you make the final decision yourself. Sometimes a “correction” will seriously change the meaning. The style might be wrong for your intended readers.

The point isn’t to flee from all forms of artificial intelligence. It’s to keep the content and voice yours. You may not be a pro-quality writer, but I’m sure nearly all of you reading this are competent. People would rather have something in your voice than something polished, grammatically correct, and fake-sounding.

If you let software be your full-time secretary, it will have a set of biases. Every creator of original text, human or machine, does. It will express views, perhaps subtly, by its choice of words and avoidance of topics or expressions. It will say things you wouldn’t.

Better to say things in your own way, improve your style as you go, and let your writing authentically represent you.


The mark of (Dean) Cain and other victories

I was pleased to learn that ICE agent Dean Cain is having trouble getting gigs at fan conventions. GalaxyCon, a company that runs commercial fan conventions, has notified him that it won’t work with him because “GalaxyCon’s values don’t align with Dean.” He faulted GalaxyCon for not being more specific, but I can understand their wanting to handle the matter politely. He surely knows what they meant.

In August 2025, I pointed out that having an ICE agent as a guest puts attendees in danger. Cincinnati Comic Expo had him slated as a guest, and I left a comment on their Facebook post expressing my concern. I felt I was fighting a lonely battle, but later on the organization found a reason not to have him appear. GalaxyCon also sees the danger, and Cain’s reference to a “blacklist” suggests that other conventions have similarly rebuffed him.

While I doubt that I had any great influence on the decisions, I can say I was one of the first to point out the concern. Some people in the Cincinnati organization must have seen my comment. Maybe it gave someone encouragement or a better choice of words to address the issue. The effect of what you say isn’t always immediate or obvious.

In other good news, Rockingham County in New Hampshire has “tabled” plans to hold ICE abductees in the county jail. County commissioners Tombarello and Coyle supported this position. In September 2025 I wrote about Commissioner Steven Goddu’s position, which was basically that the county should be morally agnostic and grab the opportunity for federal money: “It is not my position that the county should evaluate the appropriateness of actions ICE is taking.”

Did I have any significant effect on the decision to turn ICE away? Probably not, but it’s possible I made a little difference. This post, if the right people see it, might encourage someone to run against Goddu and replace him.

Speak out when you can, after being as informed as you can. It can make a difference.

Layout note: Up to now, I’ve laid out the blog with ten posts per page, displaying only the start of each post. This is causing problems with email subscriptions, which I just can’t get to show the start of the post and clearly let the recipient know there’s more. Starting with this post, I’m switching to putting full posts in the blog page. Once there are a couple of these, I’ll reduce the posts per page from 10 to 5. I think this will make it easier for people to follow the blog without extra navigation. Let me know what you think.


New Hampshire libraries and free speech

Writing this makes me nervous. It deals with institutions I’m close to, and it’s one of those cases where both sides look bad. But it’s important to say it, and it might have a positive effect just because I’m so close. These events happened a while ago, but I just learned about them while researching something else. (That happens a lot.)

On one side we have Arlene Quaratiello, a minor New Hampshire politician and librarian who takes a restrictive view on what libraries should carry. On the other side we have the Dudley-Tucker Library in Raymond, New Hampshire, which violated her First Amendment rights. Quaratiello, who lives in Atkinson (which is also Karoline Leavitt’s home; what is it about that town?), wrote to a local news site endorsing two candidates for library trustee. She emailed a Republican Party chapter urging them to run conservative candidates for library trustee positions. Her letter advocated “protecting our children from the increasing amount of inappropriate material available … without sacrificing the intellectual freedom that has always characterized public libraries.”

This is at least worrisome, but it’s her right in the United States to express those views. She expressed them on her own time, using her personal resources. In spite of that, the Dudley-Tucker Library, where she was Assistant Director, terminated her. The reason given was “lack of separation of personal/political values and agendas from DTL policies, procedures, and occurrences” and that she supposedly was “not able to maintain the separation between personal and Library tenets.”
(more…)